Skip to content

COMEDY CLASSIC: “Watermelon Man”

June 18, 2009
tags: ,

Watermelon ManSo my friend told me about this movie the other day while we were discussing Blaxploitation flicks, and I hadn’t even heard of it. “You haven’t heard of Watermelon Man?” he said. “Aww man, you gotta watch it.” And so I did.

I was NOT ready.

Watermelon Man is about an obnoxious, racist white man who wakes up one morning to find that he is black. The film came out in 1970 and Melvin Van Peebles directed it; these two facts alone should give you a general idea of what to expect, but I shall continue.

First of all the actor, Godfrey Cambridge, was hilariously convincing as an obnoxious white man. You know the kind that even other white people despise? The overly comfortable, corny joke-telling, in your face, smart ass bigotty type. He’s married with two kids and his “liberal” white wife is essentially bored with their relationship. In other words, he has just enough going against him to make you anticipate his impending fate.

Because this film was directed by Melvin Van Peebles, it didn’t take the stereotypical turns that I would expect from say, a white director. The character is not originally WHITE in BLACKFACE. No. This isn’t Soul Man. And when Cambridge’s character turns black, his penis doesn’t magically enlarge, his accent doesn’t change and he doesn’t become a superstar athlete. No, Mr. Van Peebles wasn’t about to let us go out like that. In fact, the film plays more on white fear of blackness than anything else, which says a lot about the time during which it was made.

I laughed outloud a couple of times during this movie, because some of the one-liners and simple actions are KILLER. When Cambridge’s wife first discovers her new “black” husband after he emerges from an 8 hour shower to try to scrub the blackness off, she asks: “Should I hide the money?” And the main character consistently drinks and BATHES in milk in hopes of turning white again. It is Mr. Van Peebles interpretation of whites’ perspective of blacks that makes this film so funny at some points.

On some technical shit, Watermelon Man is QUITE bootleg. I know it’s the 70s, but Mr. Van Peebles, why is your loud ass, offbeat score overlapping important dialogue? In fact, the score was out of place during SEVERAL parts of the movie and it was distracting as hell. Also funny were some of the odd transitions, camera angles and editing choices. At one particular sequence toward the end, the movie randomly turned into a PSA, with a random, but lyrically relevant song break and big titles interrupting the scene.

Aside from the clear experimentation evident by Mr. Van Peebles throughout this film, I have to say that I actually appreciated the movie. In some ways, the film was ahead of its time. The “white face” make-up, for example, was clearly tapped into by Dave Chappelle and the Wayans Brothers. The ending sequence, as the main character begins to accept his fate as a black man was actually really well done and if I was a movie-goer during this time period, I would definitely appreciate the empowerment.

See this movie if you’re in the mood for a militant laugh.

9 Comments leave one →
  1. June 18, 2009 4:52 pm

    Yeah, I remember this one. I started to do a piece on it a while back. It’s definitely worth taking a peek at. Whatever happened to Godrey Cambridge anyway? I know that he was a comedian and at some point he gained a ridiculous amount of weight, but he seems to have just disappeared.

  2. Rocky Horror permalink*
    June 18, 2009 5:19 pm

    He dead.

  3. June 19, 2009 7:15 am

    Oh. Then that would explain it.

  4. Missy permalink
    June 19, 2009 7:43 pm

    I have never heard of this movie but for some reason it seems interesting….maybe because it doesn’t break into the same stereotypes that most directors automatically choose. Where on earth would I even go about finding it…GOOGLE to the rescue!

    • June 20, 2009 9:32 am

      Or Netflix, if you’re on it! It’s available to watch instantly.

  5. Rocky Horror permalink*
    June 20, 2009 10:09 am

    You liked this film a lot better than I did. It wasn’t horrible, but I found Godfrey’s performance to be a bit just too much for the most part. And he looked so terrible as YT! But that may have been part of the joke.

    Also, sometimes I have issues with Melvin’s editing–it sometimes looks like a 4 year old contributed, lol.

  6. Debra permalink
    July 26, 2011 2:30 pm

    I saw this movie at a very young age-six or seven-with my grandmother who taught me everything. I was able to understand the issues, because I lived back then. I remember shopkeepers back then watching me, a scrawny black child like a hawk, and being shocked at my intelligence. I remember not being allowed toy, but they always pretended it was for some other reason. I remember when things were much worse than they are today, but blacks had more pride. The ’80s changed a lot of that, and blacks seemed intent on taking themselves out. Things seem to be improving where that is concerned. Racism is not what it once was, but since Obama became president, there seems to be a resurgence. Worthy movie though, as a kid, high I.Q. or not, I don’t remember much about the editing.

  7. Adom permalink
    February 1, 2012 5:12 am

    I just saw most of this movie this morning on TV. Tried to catch the rest on Netflix, but they only have it as a DVD now. I feel like a lot of language that is offensive was cut and was curious how much it changes the impact of certain scenes.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: